Your Letters
|
We want to hear your points of view in regard to the European Union, or this website and its articles. Why not write to us with your views ? |
thE UnitI love your Web Site, the truth at last and so wonderfully written terrific! Please give me my democratic vote on in or out and I will most certainly vote to leave.What fun we will have spending all this money we give them every day! Bring it on ASAP.
Mrs Meggy North Norfolk The EU Business RegisterHi Rick. This unsolicited email arrived today. Before I trudge through the document can you advise me if this is a real register? The email reads:-
Dear Madam/Sir,
In order to have your company inserted in the EU Business Register for 2013/2014, please print, complete and submit the attached form (PDF file) to the following address:
EU BUSINESS REGISTER P.O.BOX 3079 3502 GB UTRECHT THE NETHERLANDS
Fax: +31 205 248 107
Updating is free of charge. Regards Barry Blaker Our ResponseUpon further investigation, and through reading the PDF application form that came attached with the email, it was revealed that this is really an elaborate scam. Essentially the company makes a subscription / membership charge of 995.00 euro's per year, which is part of the contract that you sign up to when you send back the form. The email and indeed the application gives the impression that this is a free service but the Terms and Conditions and the fine print on the application state the fee's payable. Scams like this really upon the disconnect between the accounts / purchasing department and the person signing off on the application. The applicant is lead to believe the service is free, but then they are later invoiced for the fee's, all along the way the scammers rely upon the clever use of wording, for example in the above email it states that Updating is free of charge, however Insetiion is not. If your involved in business then this is one to keep an eye for. Thanks for your letter Barry. Last Updated (Tuesday, 18 June 2013 15:28) ImmigrationThe Editor Derby Telegraph
Sir, Roy Wheatley asks what is the purpose of large scale immigration when we have so many people out of work (30 May). The answer is quite simple. It was a deliberate government policy to “undermine national homogeneity”. It used to be the duty of government to protect the native population from invasion and colonisation. Now they have stood that duty on its head. Andrew Neather revealed that New Labour boosted Third World immigration with the deliberate intent of causing irreversible demographic change – in short the government was electing a new people which, it calculated, would be more likely to vote Labour. Peter Sutherland, former EU Commissioner, former head of the World Trade Organisation, former Chairman of BP, member of the shadowy Bilderberg group and Goldman Sachs multi millionaire, told the House of Lords in June last year that the EU should do its best to undermine the homogeneity of native populations . He criticised the very modest restriction imposed by the present government, saying it had no basis in international law. He also called on EU governments to reverse policies favouring “highly skilled” immigrants. As the contents of our jails show, the advent of multiculturalism has not been an unmixed blessing. What on earth can be the point of importing unskilled people to a country experiencing high unemployment, if not simply to force down wages? That may well suit Goldman Sachs. Add to this a highly attractive system of welfare payments, much more generous than in the Eastern member states of the EU and we can expect many more coming to live off us as well. They will have a right to do so, as long as we remain in the EU . This government favours staying in the EU and Turkish EU membership. This will bring an inevitable consequent huge influx from that highly populated, fecund country. At the beginning of its time in office, the Blair government commissioned a study on British identity by the Runnymede Trust. Their report asserted that the terms “British” and “English” were so laden with racist overtones that they should be avoided wherever possible. They even considered the possibility of giving our country an entirely new name but did not make any recommendation. So the native British people are wedged three ways - between the ideologues of the Left who really hate and despise us, the EU which wants to destroy our national identity and the massive vested interest of corporate capital which wants to use both of these forces to help the prosperity of Goldman Sachs and friends , making their investments more profitable by forcing down wages.
Yours faithfully, Edward Spalton Last Updated (Wednesday, 12 June 2013 10:09) Scotland Has No Desire To Be Independent I was alerted to this post of Captain Ranty's by a regular reader. Sadly I agree with what he says.
Subrosa online here Last Updated (Wednesday, 12 June 2013 10:50) Keep up the good workDear Administrator, I have, for many years always voted for UKIP, there is no one else worthy of my vote. As far as I am concerned this awful business of being part of Europe goes back to 1944 and France has an awful lot to answer for. The European Union does very little for the United Kingdom they are underhanded in everything they do and it is costing the UK a fortune. They try to scare us with losing trade if we come out, but that is not true, every country survives on imports and exports and they need our goods as much as we need theirs. Your daily news letter keeps us up to date with articles that the general news will not tell us. Keep up the good work it is so important and I spread the word where ever I go.The British Public has to be informed and educated. Yours faithfully Geoffrey D Strong |



Your letters and articles are invaluable. Too often the media and politicians get caught up in their own hype. Your letters represent the true voice of the people, whether for or against, in or out. It is your opinion that counts most.